• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Staff
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Related Links
    • FAQ
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Teaching  English Lnaguage Studies
Articles in Press
Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2018)
Volume Volume 6 (2017)
Volume Volume 5 (2016)
Volume Volume 4 (2015)
Volume Volume 3 (2014)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 2 (2013)
Volume Volume 1 (2012)
Nevisandeh, N., Mohebbi, M. (2014). Authenticity and Test Taker's Strategies in Iranian EFL Classes. Journal of Teaching English Lnaguage Studies, 3(2), 88-104.
Neda Nevisandeh; Monireh Mohebbi. "Authenticity and Test Taker's Strategies in Iranian EFL Classes". Journal of Teaching English Lnaguage Studies, 3, 2, 2014, 88-104.
Nevisandeh, N., Mohebbi, M. (2014). 'Authenticity and Test Taker's Strategies in Iranian EFL Classes', Journal of Teaching English Lnaguage Studies, 3(2), pp. 88-104.
Nevisandeh, N., Mohebbi, M. Authenticity and Test Taker's Strategies in Iranian EFL Classes. Journal of Teaching English Lnaguage Studies, 2014; 3(2): 88-104.

Authenticity and Test Taker's Strategies in Iranian EFL Classes

Article 6, Volume 3, Issue 2, Autumn 2014, Page 88-104  XML PDF (3.64 MB)
Authors
Neda Nevisandeh1; Monireh Mohebbi2
1Department of English, Faculty of humanities, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran
2Department of English, Faculty of humanities, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran
Abstract
The theoretical framework for this study is research in the areas of language testing and
reading. and overview of language testing and current developments in language testing research,
including factors that affect test performance and authentic assessment. Test type as the task
variable, test-taking strategies and gender as the reader variable, and authenticity as the text
variable were selected and their interaction is examined. Therefore, the present study sets out to
investigate the specific test-taking strategies employed by Iranian EFL students, reading
authentic or simplified reading texts and the difference between the two sets of strategies, to
explore whether males and females reported different patterns of reading and test-taking strategy
use, and whether respondents to multiple-choice and open-ended questions used different testtaking
strategies while reading. methodology of the study, including the characteristics of the
participants, the structure of the materials, and the description of the procedure which has been
used in the present study and finally the details of the statistical measures employed to analyze
the data collected.
Keywords
Authentic Texts-Test-taking Strategies- Test Type- Reading Strategies; reading comprehension
References
Abbott, L. M. (2006). ESL reading strategies: Differences in Arabic and Mandarin speaker test
performance. Language Learning, 56(4), 633-670.
Ahmad, A. B. (2006). The effect of using authentic English language materials on EFL students'
achievement in reading comprehension. Journal of Educational & Psychological
Sciences, 7(1), 8-21
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Carson, J., G. & Longhini, A. (2002). Focusing on learning styles and strategies: A diary study in
an immersion setting. Language Learning, 52(2), 401-438.
Dolly, J. P., & Williams, K. S. (1986). Using test-taking strategies to maximize multiple-choice
test scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46(3), 619-625.
Ehrman, M. E. & Oxford, R. L. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice, and
psychological type on adult language learning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 73,
1-13.
Ghaemi, N. (2009). The psychology of Iranian-American relations: Delving into the psyches of
Iran and America. Psychology Today. Retrieved March 11, 2009 from
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mood-swings/200902/the-psychology-iranianamerican-
relations
Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL
Quarterly, 25(3), 375-396.
Hayashi, K. (1999). Reading strategies and extensive reading in EFL classes. RELC Journal,
30(2), 114–132.
Ikeda, M., & Takeuchi, O. (2006). Clarifying the differences in learning EFL reading strategies:
An analysis of portfolios. System, 34, 384-398.
Katalin, B. (2007). Reflections on the test-taking strategies of 7th and 11th grade Hungarian
students of English. NovELTy, 7(3), 1-8.
Lan, R., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning strategy profile of elementary school
students in Taiwan. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching,
41, 339-379.
Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for Language Learning and for Language Use: Revising the
Theoretical Framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 320-337.
Nakatani, Y. (2006). Developing an oral communication strategy inventory. The Modern
Language Journal, 90(2), 151-168.
Oller, J.W. (1979). Language tests at school. London: Longman.
Parks, S., & Raymond, P. M. (2004). Strategy use by nonnative-English-speaking students in an
MBA program: Not business as usual. The Modern Language Journal, 88(3), 374-389.
JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, Vol. 3, NO. 2, Fall 2014
104
Rahimi, M. (2005).On the test-taking strategies and test performance: A construct validity study
of the listening section of the IELTS from candidates’ perspective. Unpublished master’s
thesis, University of Tehran, Tehran.
Schoonen, R., Holstijn, J., & Bossers, B. (1998). Metacognitive and language-specific
knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension: An empirical study
among Dutch students in grades 6, 8 and 10. Language Learning, 48(1), 71-106.
Tan, M. (2005). Authentic language or language errors? Lessons from a learner corpus. ELT
Journal, 59(2), 126-134.
Vattanapath, R., & Jaiprayoon, K. (1999). An assessment of the effectiveness of teaching testtaking
strategies for multiple-choice English reading comprehension tests. SLLT, 8, 57-
71.
Wallace, C. (2001). Reading. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching
English to speakers of other languages (pp. 21-27). Cambridge, England: Cambridge
University Press.
Yamamori, K., Isoda, T., Hiromori, T., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Using cluster analysis to uncover
L2 learner differences in strategy use, will to learn, and achievement over time.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41, 381-409.
Zoubir-Shaw, S. & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Gender difference in language learning strategy use in
university-level introductory French classes. In C. A. Klee (Ed.), Faces in a crowd: The
individual learner in multisection courses (pp. 181-213). Boston: Heinle & Heinle

Statistics
Article View: 52
PDF Download: 25
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by sinaweb.